Hello,
Thanks to Intuit's brilliant marketing department, our QuickBooks Premier Contractor's Edition 2004 will no longer work for payroll after May 1st. Good job guys.
Originally our old server (NT4.0, PPro 200x2. 10GB SCSI drive, 10Mbps network) ran the server version of QB and we had multi-users (well two really) that then dwindled to one. After complaints about data access speed issues, I relocated QB to the bookkeeper's local machine and updated the PC. It's a P4 2.4 running Win2K SP4, I recently put in a new ATA 100 IDE HDD, wired gigabit LAN and increased the RAM to 1GB. It's a peppy machine for its purposes. We back up the QB data to the server both manually on occasion plus automatically every night (can anyone recognize anal retentive disorder?
).
Upon reviewing my options for QB 2007 install one of the options is to place the database on the SBS2003SP2 Premium server and point the bookkeeper's machine to the company file. SBS will not run the app, just host the DB. The server has 3 Raptors in RAID 5 for data and is powered by (2) 1.6GHz Opterons + gigabit LAN.
We might be going to multi-user in the future as part of our inventory/POS overhaul, but for now it's just one machine that needs QB. I personally like the idea of the QB DB residing on the server but worry about the speed issues, the user is a real whiner and if the speed is going to take a major hit I will have to relocate the file to the local machine, not the end of the world but I would like to get it right the first time.
Can anyone give me an idea of the speed difference between local ATA 100 IDE and network LAN transfer from 10K Raptor RAID5 over GBe? Right now I am leaning towards simply upgrading the local machine's QB and leaving the DB on it also. As always all input is welcomed.
Tony
Thanks to Intuit's brilliant marketing department, our QuickBooks Premier Contractor's Edition 2004 will no longer work for payroll after May 1st. Good job guys.
Originally our old server (NT4.0, PPro 200x2. 10GB SCSI drive, 10Mbps network) ran the server version of QB and we had multi-users (well two really) that then dwindled to one. After complaints about data access speed issues, I relocated QB to the bookkeeper's local machine and updated the PC. It's a P4 2.4 running Win2K SP4, I recently put in a new ATA 100 IDE HDD, wired gigabit LAN and increased the RAM to 1GB. It's a peppy machine for its purposes. We back up the QB data to the server both manually on occasion plus automatically every night (can anyone recognize anal retentive disorder?
![[smile] [smile] [smile]](/data/assets/smilies/smile.gif)
Upon reviewing my options for QB 2007 install one of the options is to place the database on the SBS2003SP2 Premium server and point the bookkeeper's machine to the company file. SBS will not run the app, just host the DB. The server has 3 Raptors in RAID 5 for data and is powered by (2) 1.6GHz Opterons + gigabit LAN.
We might be going to multi-user in the future as part of our inventory/POS overhaul, but for now it's just one machine that needs QB. I personally like the idea of the QB DB residing on the server but worry about the speed issues, the user is a real whiner and if the speed is going to take a major hit I will have to relocate the file to the local machine, not the end of the world but I would like to get it right the first time.
Can anyone give me an idea of the speed difference between local ATA 100 IDE and network LAN transfer from 10K Raptor RAID5 over GBe? Right now I am leaning towards simply upgrading the local machine's QB and leaving the DB on it also. As always all input is welcomed.
Tony