Hi,
What is the overhead of referring to an alias rather than an actual table?
What I am thinking of is a situation where there is one DB2 subsystem with two schemas each of which must contain an exact copy of the same refernce table.
Is it more efficient to create one copy of the table and an alias in the second schema or is it better to have two physical copies of the table?
Thanks,
Mike.
What is the overhead of referring to an alias rather than an actual table?
What I am thinking of is a situation where there is one DB2 subsystem with two schemas each of which must contain an exact copy of the same refernce table.
Is it more efficient to create one copy of the table and an alias in the second schema or is it better to have two physical copies of the table?
Thanks,
Mike.