I have a database that I am building to keep track of when people apply for a job with our law firm. For a detailed explanation of
the db, please see post: thread702-964418 .
Right now, I am working on a specific issue. I have a toggle type option group. This option group is set to show and hide
appropriate tabs on a tab control within the form. Each tab has a subform. For this to make sense, let me explain the detail. The
main form is a candidate form, which comes from the main candidate table. The option group specifies the type of candidate. The
type may be attorney, HR, IT, paralegal, Administration and so on. Each option sets its appropriate tab and subform to be visible,
so that the user can enter in that specific person's candidate type specific information. My issue is that I have a candidate id on
each subform which is how the main form and subform are linked.
That sounds all good but when I view it, I see a number, and not the name of the candidate. I am not sure if I should make not
visible, or if there is a better method for showing the candidate name on the subform, as it is on the main form. I think I am wanting
to do this, maybe even for myself, to ensure that the subform is on the same record as the main form.
Any thoughts?
Something I am looking at now is the relationships between my tables. I have the candidate table, and then I have each candtype
table. My thought is that the cand ID should be enough, but I wonder if I need to somehow tie in the candidate type. The
candidate type gets stored in a candtype field in the candidate table, but each candtype table does not have any connection to its
type identifier. I have a candtype table to serve as the candidate type master where each type is defined. Do I need to somehow
attach this to each candtype table? That would be the attorney table, hr table, IT table...
If anyone is just soooo curious to see this db, please let me know I can zip it up and email it out or share it out on my yahoo
briefcase. I would love any help that can be given in organizing the set up of this.
Thanks.
misscrf
Management is doing things right, leadership is doing the right things
the db, please see post: thread702-964418 .
Right now, I am working on a specific issue. I have a toggle type option group. This option group is set to show and hide
appropriate tabs on a tab control within the form. Each tab has a subform. For this to make sense, let me explain the detail. The
main form is a candidate form, which comes from the main candidate table. The option group specifies the type of candidate. The
type may be attorney, HR, IT, paralegal, Administration and so on. Each option sets its appropriate tab and subform to be visible,
so that the user can enter in that specific person's candidate type specific information. My issue is that I have a candidate id on
each subform which is how the main form and subform are linked.
That sounds all good but when I view it, I see a number, and not the name of the candidate. I am not sure if I should make not
visible, or if there is a better method for showing the candidate name on the subform, as it is on the main form. I think I am wanting
to do this, maybe even for myself, to ensure that the subform is on the same record as the main form.
Any thoughts?
Something I am looking at now is the relationships between my tables. I have the candidate table, and then I have each candtype
table. My thought is that the cand ID should be enough, but I wonder if I need to somehow tie in the candidate type. The
candidate type gets stored in a candtype field in the candidate table, but each candtype table does not have any connection to its
type identifier. I have a candtype table to serve as the candidate type master where each type is defined. Do I need to somehow
attach this to each candtype table? That would be the attorney table, hr table, IT table...
If anyone is just soooo curious to see this db, please let me know I can zip it up and email it out or share it out on my yahoo
briefcase. I would love any help that can be given in organizing the set up of this.
Thanks.
misscrf
Management is doing things right, leadership is doing the right things