LittleSmudge
Programmer
I have a MySQL database with MSAccess front ends interfacing over ODBC.
Currently the users are at 8 geographically disperced sites connected via a VPN WAN and all is working okay.
However, one of the application databases is almost excusivly used at one remote site. Therefore the suggestion is to put an instance of MySQL ( we're using 4.1.12 ) at the remote site and let users interface to that ( quicker responce to user interface and resilient to WAN failure as they'll be running on LAN only. )
All of this I have done.
HOWEVER, the next step is to synchronise the copy at the remote site with the local ( head office copy )
( Thoughts are - that if this can be done at each site then the whole system is resilient to WAN fall over as local offices can keep working one their local instance if the WAN is lost )
I've tooked at MySQL Cluster but it is not recommended for Internet connectivity.
Any thoughts on how this can be achieved ?
G LS
spsinkNOJUNK@yahoo.co.uk
Remove the NOJUNK to use.
Currently the users are at 8 geographically disperced sites connected via a VPN WAN and all is working okay.
However, one of the application databases is almost excusivly used at one remote site. Therefore the suggestion is to put an instance of MySQL ( we're using 4.1.12 ) at the remote site and let users interface to that ( quicker responce to user interface and resilient to WAN failure as they'll be running on LAN only. )
All of this I have done.
HOWEVER, the next step is to synchronise the copy at the remote site with the local ( head office copy )
( Thoughts are - that if this can be done at each site then the whole system is resilient to WAN fall over as local offices can keep working one their local instance if the WAN is lost )
I've tooked at MySQL Cluster but it is not recommended for Internet connectivity.
Any thoughts on how this can be achieved ?
G LS
spsinkNOJUNK@yahoo.co.uk
Remove the NOJUNK to use.