At my work we've got the 172.16.0.0/16 network subnetted like follows:
172.16.24.0 255.255.255.0
172.16.30.0 255.255.255.192
172.16.200.0 255.255.255.0
172.16.240.0 255.255.255.0
172.16.241.0 255.255.255.0
172.16.242.0 255.255.255.0
172.16.243.0 255.255.255.0
172.16.250.0 255.255.255.128
172.16.250.128 255.255.255.128
172.16.251.0 255.255.255.0
172.16.252.0 255.255.255.0
172.16.253.0 255.255.255.0
172.16.253.1 255.255.255.255
Does this break any subnetting/VLSM rules? Or best practices? I'm getting some weird behaviour on the network and I want to rule this part of it out if it shouldn't be a problem.
Thanks for your time.
172.16.24.0 255.255.255.0
172.16.30.0 255.255.255.192
172.16.200.0 255.255.255.0
172.16.240.0 255.255.255.0
172.16.241.0 255.255.255.0
172.16.242.0 255.255.255.0
172.16.243.0 255.255.255.0
172.16.250.0 255.255.255.128
172.16.250.128 255.255.255.128
172.16.251.0 255.255.255.0
172.16.252.0 255.255.255.0
172.16.253.0 255.255.255.0
172.16.253.1 255.255.255.255
Does this break any subnetting/VLSM rules? Or best practices? I'm getting some weird behaviour on the network and I want to rule this part of it out if it shouldn't be a problem.
Thanks for your time.