I currently have multiple PVC's between a local 7500 router and a<br>
2600 router at a remote location. I have IBM controllers and some<br>
3770 devices at the remote end, all of which will communicate with<br>
my local FEP. Each of these devices uses it's own serial interface<br>
on the router, but all route across the same PVC due to the fact that only 1 stun peer-name can exist on each router. I could load<br>
balance across the PVC's to the other router, but what I would like<br>
to do is route each specific STUN connection across it's own<br>
specific PVC. In other words, all controller traffic would cross<br>
a specific frame sub-interface, and all 3770 traffic would cross <br>
another frame sub-interface. I don't think this is possible, but<br>
if anyone has any ideals, I'd like to hear them.<br>
2600 router at a remote location. I have IBM controllers and some<br>
3770 devices at the remote end, all of which will communicate with<br>
my local FEP. Each of these devices uses it's own serial interface<br>
on the router, but all route across the same PVC due to the fact that only 1 stun peer-name can exist on each router. I could load<br>
balance across the PVC's to the other router, but what I would like<br>
to do is route each specific STUN connection across it's own<br>
specific PVC. In other words, all controller traffic would cross<br>
a specific frame sub-interface, and all 3770 traffic would cross <br>
another frame sub-interface. I don't think this is possible, but<br>
if anyone has any ideals, I'd like to hear them.<br>