Still Dumbfounded on 662-851-xxxx 1

[whender]

TW says I am outpulsing 7 digits. All calls to all area codes work even 662-550-xxxx plus all others so far as I know. Dest 9. Route 1 any absorb 1. I did not look today, but could it public networks length for 662-851-xxxx only set to 7 digits. Senior, senior, moment here. If not I do not know where to look. 662 numbers are dialed all day long with no other problems beside the 662-851. Hate to beat a dead horse, but just lost on this one for some reason...Do you have to add NXX codes to some table somewhere. (not NPA)

tks

 

[curlycord]

You have started 3 posts on the same topic, not going to suggests something already suggested as a waste of time.....which is free.



=----(((((((((()----=
curlycord

http://www.curlycord.com

Toronto Canada

http://www.telcopc.ca

 

[whender]

Wow, Thanks Curlycord. Never would have thought to check the other responses before posting again. OBVIOUSLY, THEY DID NOT WORK....Just trying to solve a problem and I was very frustrated. Been there, done that. I usually respect your answerw, but this time I needed help and not criticism. I am not BLOND. The problem turned out to be the DFLT publice network length under Dialing Plans. It was set to 7. I know that is default, but I could not understand how other things were working. We are in an area of the country that requires a 1 for some 662 numbers and no 1 for other 662 numbers. I could not see how the ROUTE 001 absorb 1 was the problem.

Anyway...I was very disappointed in your answer......It was not the route and dest...

tks

 

[curlycord]

It was simply a comment on what you have done and how it wastes peoples time and that you should have responded to your first thread yesterday in the way that 100% of the other posters do.
If you expect me to waste my time and dig up the threads to see what was mentioned, whats has been done on your part or carriers part etc etc then its not going to happen.
It could even be why you did not get many responses when normally you should have received several.

It wasn't the fact that you didn't check the other threads, its the fact you keep starting new ones and not only that you did not have the decency to respond to tipsters who did try to assist you so it WAS NOT OBVIOUS.

Almost of ALL of your post have no responses or answers to our comments or questions.
Had you kept it to one thread so it can be reviewed much easier for all I would have been glad to try and assist as I have done for 10 years here by scrolling up and down instead of 3 tabs to bounce back and forth.

Also please note that I didn't even suggest Dest or Routes (or even fully read above) as I never responded to your 2 other posts for the exact reasons mentioned above so nothing to be disappointed about.

It was somebody else who mentioned Dest and Routes whom is very knowledgeable but there is a lot of programming and with lack of details or setup etc you will find you may bot always get what you want but if you are going to be "very disappointed" with tipsters who might be wrong from time to time then I simply speechless.

Where you say you need "help" we need "replies" to our comments/suggestion and/or a simple "thanks".

Good luck to you.

cc









=----(((((((((()----=
curlycord

http://www.curlycord.com

Toronto Canada

http://www.telcopc.ca