Hello All,
Is this a true statement?
An interface on the pix cannot access another interface unless a NAT or
static is put in place.
For Example, I have a 515e with 6 interfaces. I set up a webserver (192.168.4.100) on Dmz2. We could not access the server at all from inside until we added the following static:
static (inside,dmz2) 192.168.3.0 192.168.3.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 0 0 {.3.0 is inside}
We did have this in the config:
access-list In_inside permit ip any host 209.27.100.100
alias (inside) 209.27.100.100 192.168.4.100 255.255.255.255
Bob
Is this a true statement?
An interface on the pix cannot access another interface unless a NAT or
static is put in place.
For Example, I have a 515e with 6 interfaces. I set up a webserver (192.168.4.100) on Dmz2. We could not access the server at all from inside until we added the following static:
static (inside,dmz2) 192.168.3.0 192.168.3.0 netmask 255.255.255.0 0 0 {.3.0 is inside}
We did have this in the config:
access-list In_inside permit ip any host 209.27.100.100
alias (inside) 209.27.100.100 192.168.4.100 255.255.255.255
Bob