stevenriz
IS-IT--Management
- May 21, 2001
- 1,069
Hi. I have a question about this SMB patch for Windows. According to this security bulletin a server can become vulnerable to remote code execution using ports 139 and 445.
My question is this. When I do a netstat on the server, I do not see either of these ports listenting. Does this mean we are not vulnerable? Even though they aren't listening, can an attacher still exploit the ports?
My question is this. When I do a netstat on the server, I do not see either of these ports listenting. Does this mean we are not vulnerable? Even though they aren't listening, can an attacher still exploit the ports?