Hello,
I work for a university with two campuses. Between campuses we have two leased T1's, each with about 960K available bandwidth for data. The traffic across the WAN is *incredibly* slow, even though our use of the bandwidth never exceeds 390K on one T1 and only spikes above 480K on the other one during the dead of the night.
I'm on the software / server / PC side of things. The network infrastructure guy I work with (who's on the other campus, so isn't affected by the slow WAN)insists that the very fact that we're not using our max bandwidth means that the slowness is not an issue with the T1's / network hardware.
To my way of thinking, this seems backwards. If our data transmission is so bogged down that our WAN performance is slow, then more of the bandwidth *should* be used.
Is there something you know of which could be damping out data transmission or preventing us from making use of the entire bandwidth?
Thanks!!
I work for a university with two campuses. Between campuses we have two leased T1's, each with about 960K available bandwidth for data. The traffic across the WAN is *incredibly* slow, even though our use of the bandwidth never exceeds 390K on one T1 and only spikes above 480K on the other one during the dead of the night.
I'm on the software / server / PC side of things. The network infrastructure guy I work with (who's on the other campus, so isn't affected by the slow WAN)insists that the very fact that we're not using our max bandwidth means that the slowness is not an issue with the T1's / network hardware.
To my way of thinking, this seems backwards. If our data transmission is so bogged down that our WAN performance is slow, then more of the bandwidth *should* be used.
Is there something you know of which could be damping out data transmission or preventing us from making use of the entire bandwidth?
Thanks!!