usuallyconfused
Technical User
Questions, questions...
My Cyber-shot digital camera can take images from 640x480 up to 2048x1536. If I take a range of pictures at 640x480, I get a range of jpeg files which vary in size from 37KB to 78KB. Why are the file sizes different, given the same camera and settings?
If I open of my 640x480 jpeg images, which is 78KB, in PSP and look at the image information, it shows it as being 72 pixels per inch and 16 million colours. If I now save the image, but using different compression factors, a compression factor of 1 produces a file of size 7KB and a compression factor of 99 produces a file of size 173KB. If I want to save the image as a file the same size as the original, I have to use a compression factor of 15. Assuming that the original image has no compression, why is it that saving the image with a compression factor of 1 gives a file so much bigger than the original? I would have expected it to be the same.
Selecting Resize then Actual/Print Size, I can change the Resolution and although the Width/Height changes, it doesn't actually make any changes to the file if I save it. However, manually change the Width/Height and it does change the image. What is the relationship between image size and resolution in this case?
Again, looking at the Resize dialog box, it shows the Width as 22.58cm and Resolution as 72, but when I print it out, it is actually 16.93cm wide. If I change the Resolution to 96, then the Width is shown as 16.93cm, which is interesting because using small fonts, my screen display is 96 dpi. Is there any connection?
However, it is not the size on the screen that matters, but the size when printed. How is the size/resolution related to the size when printed?
I am trying to get my head round this whole issue and any help would be appreciated.
My Cyber-shot digital camera can take images from 640x480 up to 2048x1536. If I take a range of pictures at 640x480, I get a range of jpeg files which vary in size from 37KB to 78KB. Why are the file sizes different, given the same camera and settings?
If I open of my 640x480 jpeg images, which is 78KB, in PSP and look at the image information, it shows it as being 72 pixels per inch and 16 million colours. If I now save the image, but using different compression factors, a compression factor of 1 produces a file of size 7KB and a compression factor of 99 produces a file of size 173KB. If I want to save the image as a file the same size as the original, I have to use a compression factor of 15. Assuming that the original image has no compression, why is it that saving the image with a compression factor of 1 gives a file so much bigger than the original? I would have expected it to be the same.
Selecting Resize then Actual/Print Size, I can change the Resolution and although the Width/Height changes, it doesn't actually make any changes to the file if I save it. However, manually change the Width/Height and it does change the image. What is the relationship between image size and resolution in this case?
Again, looking at the Resize dialog box, it shows the Width as 22.58cm and Resolution as 72, but when I print it out, it is actually 16.93cm wide. If I change the Resolution to 96, then the Width is shown as 16.93cm, which is interesting because using small fonts, my screen display is 96 dpi. Is there any connection?
However, it is not the size on the screen that matters, but the size when printed. How is the size/resolution related to the size when printed?
I am trying to get my head round this whole issue and any help would be appreciated.