I did this on both routers. Is it correct?
(Ip address is different)
interface Serial0/0
no ip address
no ip directed-broadcast
encapsulation frame-relay
no ip route-cache
no ip mroute-cache
no keepalive
no fair-queue
!
interface Serial0/0.1 point-to-point
ip address 10.10.10.2 255.255.255.0
no ip directed-broadcast
no ip route-cache
frame-relay interface-dlci 101
!
No, it's not correct. You setup encapsulation as Frame Relay. Wont work unless you have a frame switch ( or a router as one) Use HDLC as the encapsulation.
The subinterface is fine.. IP is fine but why the class C mask on a class A address? If you are trying to get something up and running for the first time, lets keep it simple. Use a class C and the normal mask. If you want to try best practices, use a .252 to get the 2 host IPs. This is good a security trick.
!
ip address 192.168.50.5 255.255.255.252
!
! this gives .5 and .6 as the two IPs. .4 is the wire and .7 is your broadcast
Mike S
"Diplomacy; the art of saying 'nice doggie' till you can find a rock" Wynn Catlin
What is the proper way to configure bridging
between ethernet and token ring segments. I have a cisco 2613 with the appropriate interfaces. I have only configured a bridge group.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.