That means that i can use for example 4 IP-addresses on an ethernet interface? Am i right? What command is it? Do i use
IP ADDRESS A.A.A.A B.B.B.B
IP ADDRESS C.C.C.C D.D.D.D secondary
IP ADDRESS E.E.E.E F.F.F.F secondary
IP ADDRESS G.G.G.G H.H.H.H secondary
NO thats not correct .
example
route#conf t
router(config)int fa 0 <---this would be on the ethernet port
ip address 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.0
ip address 192.168.2.1 255.255.255.0 secondary
the same applies on the serial interfaces
I hope this helps , Good Luck !!
LOL- LARDUM, here is the classic two ways to do the same thing. Ariev is promoting the secondary IP addressing and I'm a subinterface *nut* Choose your poison as both will work. To be sure, there subtle differences but in your case I doubt they matter very much. In my case, I prefer the control a logical sub-interface gives me which is more then just having the second IP answering packets.
If you have a spare router I might suggest that you set it up each way and see which one you would prefer and which would work best for you.
Mike S
PS- I had been told( didnt look it up) that 2 was the limit for the secondary IP.. I guess I need to go and look it up after all. Add one more nugget of info the to pile
hi there, does someone know how to set the cisco route in this way?
e0/0 = 192.168.28.8 netmask 255.255.255.0
e0/1 = 192.168.28.9 netmask 255.255.255.0
i did try to use the command: ip classless but it doesn't work..
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.