Anyone else read this? And does anyone else besides me wish that SCO would either pull their heads outta there butts or shutup about this whole thing?
Just seems to me that the story keeps 'changing' as this whole thing creeps forward.
In the article someone mentions about SCO just wanting licences based on 'allegations, not on facts'.
They need to just show what they think is infringed/copyrighted or just let it go and shutup about it already...
Cheers!