I've got a couple consultants helping me overhaul our network for a move to a new building. We're going to be moving to SBS. We only have about 20 users currently and have our ISP supplying our email. We'll be bringing that in-house and making use of groupware functionality in Outlook.
The two bids we're most seriously looking at have divergent hardware recommendations for the server. Primarily, the difference is that one makes the server processor heavy, suggesting dual processors and one gig of RAM, whereas the other recommends only one processor, but four gigs of RAM.
I haven't been able to find any good info on where the bottlenecks lie in SBS. So I'm looking for recommendations from your experiences.
Thanks for the help.
The two bids we're most seriously looking at have divergent hardware recommendations for the server. Primarily, the difference is that one makes the server processor heavy, suggesting dual processors and one gig of RAM, whereas the other recommends only one processor, but four gigs of RAM.
I haven't been able to find any good info on where the bottlenecks lie in SBS. So I'm looking for recommendations from your experiences.
Thanks for the help.