Tek-Tips is the largest IT community on the Internet today!
Members share and learn making Tek-Tips Forums the best source of peer-reviewed technical information on the Internet!
-
Congratulations Mike Lewis on being selected by the Tek-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!
san based or lan based
- Thread starter sandyboy
- Start date
It is possible to do what is called a 'server-less' backup on a SAN. if your backup host and its client are using the same storage area network, then the client's data can be backed up without passing through the hosts involved. i would call this a SAN based backup, although i've not heard it termed that way before.
otherwise it's likely that your data is passing over your LAN while it's being backed up, which is the case for most folks.
to me, where the files reside does not determine the terminology i use to describe it, it's the method that is used to get to the endpoint.
hopefully i have not gone off track, and have answered your question.
otherwise it's likely that your data is passing over your LAN while it's being backed up, which is the case for most folks.
to me, where the files reside does not determine the terminology i use to describe it, it's the method that is used to get to the endpoint.
hopefully i have not gone off track, and have answered your question.
- Thread starter
- #3
Thanks for the reply 
Here in my environment , i have 5 SERVERS which are backup servers and they are getting backed up locally. Out of 5 servers i have a exchange servers which are clustered and they are also backup servers.
I backup the exchange database from the virtual node which i added as a machine from the active node , so would the data path will be through LAN or SAN
Thanks for the reply
Here in my environment , i have 5 SERVERS which are backup servers and they are getting backed up locally. Out of 5 servers i have a exchange servers which are clustered and they are also backup servers.
I backup the exchange database from the virtual node which i added as a machine from the active node , so would the data path will be through LAN or SAN
Thanks for the reply
- Thread starter
- #4
if you want to backup over your SAN, then you have a couple of choices:
1) Allow your backup host to 'see' the same LUNs that the exchange host uses. you will also need some sort of software mechanism that gives you the ability to run the backup in this manner. Tivoli Storage Manager (TSM) has a module for serverless backup for instance. the other enterprise backup solutions out there probably do too.
2) enable IP over your SAN and use that interface as you would your LAN. this would lighten the load on your LAN by moving the backups to a seperate network (SAN), but not on the servers. a more simple and low cost solution.
you said 'backed up locally', do you mean with a tape drive attached to each host?
1) Allow your backup host to 'see' the same LUNs that the exchange host uses. you will also need some sort of software mechanism that gives you the ability to run the backup in this manner. Tivoli Storage Manager (TSM) has a module for serverless backup for instance. the other enterprise backup solutions out there probably do too.
2) enable IP over your SAN and use that interface as you would your LAN. this would lighten the load on your LAN by moving the backups to a seperate network (SAN), but not on the servers. a more simple and low cost solution.
you said 'backed up locally', do you mean with a tape drive attached to each host?
- Thread starter
- #6
Backups have many areas to consider for performance. The very first question to ask is; "What is the slowest part of my system?"
Things that make backups slow are;
Small files <32k
Operating System
File System Fragmentation
Is Anti-virus scanning real time while backup is going
Things that make backups slow are;
Small files <32k
Operating System
File System Fragmentation
Is Anti-virus scanning real time while backup is going
- Status
Similar threads
