Before I begin to ask deliberate questions, I will introduce the little background, knowledge, and what I currently operate. I was first inroduced to the idea of remote access services while studying my WinNT4 certification course but never actually configured or worked with RAS but have a general idea of what it does.
At my current job in doing technical support for a networking hardware vendor, one of my product lines of support are small home based routers. We have VPN routers, but dont have a high-frequency call rate on them, so my experience with VPN is most commonly encountered by helping many sales reps from IBM who wish to access their company network from their homes and have access problems when implementing our normal routers behind their cable/dsl modems. Those problems are easily resolved by disabling "Block WAN Request" and enabling PPTP Passthrough, maybe even sometimes IPSEC depending on who the customers product is being used at the remote location.
I have an understanding of the concept of VPN and a little on RAS based on my expirence, but here is one more for you experts; SAMBA. I know basically what SAMBA does because I have it configured on my home network and can map the shares to my NFS servers thereby giving my Windows 98 clients access to my MP3's, and other shares that I desire. On top of that I edited the smb.conf file's "REMOTE BROWSE" and "REMOTE ANNOUNCE" features and somehow got it to work, by expirimenting from my jobs workstations(SECRET, I'll get busted if is say who I work for). Samba works remotely and I am extremely impressed with it.
Here are my naive questions. What is the major difference between the three technologies as far as applicable uses, performance, and security. Why use one over the other and if Samba alone posed to be vulnerable would VPN be combined with it. I ask this question because I find Samba/NFS togehter one of the best accomplishments with Linux yet. I find Samba both cost effective and very promising to use because of the following reasons.
1) My servers require minimal hardware resources and interaction with the systems themselves.
2) Every Windows from 95 to XP client I have tried to access my Samba works without alot of configuration or
RAM hogging third party client programs.
3) Unlike VPN, I am not tied to the remote locations intranet and can access the internet locally through my
DSL connection with much quicker access.
Questions:
1) Why do very few "general business people" know about Samba?
2) Is Samba yesterday's news, or is Samba something that was tried and failed to succeed in the business world?
3)Does no one understand Samba and get impatient like with most Linux configurations. (Few of my freinds and colleagues dont appreciate Linux at all, even the techie ones, so imagine end business users)
4) Does VPN or RAS(if its still even used) provided better performance, security,etc.?
5)Is Samba implemintaion still in its early stages, unlike
Apache which everyone seems to either know or talk about in the business?
5)How and where could I market Samba, given that Im one of the few people that I know in my area, and is it worth it?
I appreciate any opinions, but my descisions will be made by opinions that have facts that I can research on my own to determine if Samba can become as popular and as an alternative to other technologies, I didnt mention Citrix because I only hear about it but have never read, seen, or worked with anyone who mentioned its presence.
Thanks Again.
At my current job in doing technical support for a networking hardware vendor, one of my product lines of support are small home based routers. We have VPN routers, but dont have a high-frequency call rate on them, so my experience with VPN is most commonly encountered by helping many sales reps from IBM who wish to access their company network from their homes and have access problems when implementing our normal routers behind their cable/dsl modems. Those problems are easily resolved by disabling "Block WAN Request" and enabling PPTP Passthrough, maybe even sometimes IPSEC depending on who the customers product is being used at the remote location.
I have an understanding of the concept of VPN and a little on RAS based on my expirence, but here is one more for you experts; SAMBA. I know basically what SAMBA does because I have it configured on my home network and can map the shares to my NFS servers thereby giving my Windows 98 clients access to my MP3's, and other shares that I desire. On top of that I edited the smb.conf file's "REMOTE BROWSE" and "REMOTE ANNOUNCE" features and somehow got it to work, by expirimenting from my jobs workstations(SECRET, I'll get busted if is say who I work for). Samba works remotely and I am extremely impressed with it.
Here are my naive questions. What is the major difference between the three technologies as far as applicable uses, performance, and security. Why use one over the other and if Samba alone posed to be vulnerable would VPN be combined with it. I ask this question because I find Samba/NFS togehter one of the best accomplishments with Linux yet. I find Samba both cost effective and very promising to use because of the following reasons.
1) My servers require minimal hardware resources and interaction with the systems themselves.
2) Every Windows from 95 to XP client I have tried to access my Samba works without alot of configuration or
RAM hogging third party client programs.
3) Unlike VPN, I am not tied to the remote locations intranet and can access the internet locally through my
DSL connection with much quicker access.
Questions:
1) Why do very few "general business people" know about Samba?
2) Is Samba yesterday's news, or is Samba something that was tried and failed to succeed in the business world?
3)Does no one understand Samba and get impatient like with most Linux configurations. (Few of my freinds and colleagues dont appreciate Linux at all, even the techie ones, so imagine end business users)
4) Does VPN or RAS(if its still even used) provided better performance, security,etc.?
5)Is Samba implemintaion still in its early stages, unlike
Apache which everyone seems to either know or talk about in the business?
5)How and where could I market Samba, given that Im one of the few people that I know in my area, and is it worth it?
I appreciate any opinions, but my descisions will be made by opinions that have facts that I can research on my own to determine if Samba can become as popular and as an alternative to other technologies, I didnt mention Citrix because I only hear about it but have never read, seen, or worked with anyone who mentioned its presence.
Thanks Again.