Tek-Tips is the largest IT community on the Internet today!
Members share and learn making Tek-Tips Forums the best source of peer-reviewed technical information on the Internet!
-
Congratulations gkittelson on being selected by the Tek-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!
RSTP vs STP w/ portfast 1
- Thread starter Microbyte
- Start date
![[medal]](/data/assets/smilies/medal.gif "[medal] [medal]")
-
1
- #2
Portfast is a workaround for when there wasn't Rapid Spanning-tree.
Now that RST is a standard, it will probably be commonly used. Before there wasn't such a standard and the only option was to disable spanning-tree and not have a redundant layer 2 topology.
Portfast helped, where you could have an access port not follow the traditional 802.1d spanning tree Blocking > Listening > Learning > Forwarding states. You could then have regular spanning-tree on your switch to switch or trunk connections and not be worried about DHCP & Novell issues with the Spanning Tree delays.
RST is a different version of spanning tree completly, and Portfast is a hack to spanning tree.
Now that RST is a standard, it will probably be commonly used. Before there wasn't such a standard and the only option was to disable spanning-tree and not have a redundant layer 2 topology.
Portfast helped, where you could have an access port not follow the traditional 802.1d spanning tree Blocking > Listening > Learning > Forwarding states. You could then have regular spanning-tree on your switch to switch or trunk connections and not be worried about DHCP & Novell issues with the Spanning Tree delays.
RST is a different version of spanning tree completly, and Portfast is a hack to spanning tree.
- Status
Similar threads
- Locked
- Helpful tip
- Locked
- Question
