Tek-Tips is the largest IT community on the Internet today!

Members share and learn making Tek-Tips Forums the best source of peer-reviewed technical information on the Internet!

  • Congratulations IamaSherpa on being selected by the Tek-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Routing Question

Status
Not open for further replies.

networkstudent

Technical User
Sep 12, 2002
23
VE
Hi everybody and thanks for reading!

I have two linux boxes/firewall to access internet, i'm trying to
configure an ARN to load-balance between them both, this is what i
did.( my ARN has only one ethernet port)

Linux box1: 10.32.0.2/11
Linux box2: 10.64.0.2/11
ARN 1: 192.168.0.5/24
ARN 2: 10.32.0.1/11
ARN 3: 10.64.0.1/11

BayRS Ver. 15.0 (by the way, how should i upgrade proms? it was 11.03
the bayRS it had :)

The three ARN's IP are on the same circuit named CyberEth (E11 when
default)

I declared two static default routes:

0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 next hop 10.32.0.2
0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 next hop 10.64.0.2

when i look for the ip routes at the bcc prompt i displays 5 routes,
the three directly connected and the two statics, i can ping from
192.168.0.3 to:

192.168.0.5
10.32.0.1
10.64.0.1
and cannot ping the linux boxes but when i'm inside the router's TI i
can ping 10.32.0.2,10.64.0.2, 192.168.0.3 and even i can ping the
entire internet from the router but not from any host in the subnet
192.169.0.x/24

Any ideas what am i doing wrong?
From 1 to 20 in bay's experience i think i could give myself a 3, i
know a little more about cisco, these routers (bay) are very
interesting but works different, in cisco you use subinterfaces and so
but here it appears that you can use more than one IP for an interface
and use it like a physical one, that's great! :)

Thanks Again!


Jose
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor

Back
Top