Tek-Tips is the largest IT community on the Internet today!

Members share and learn making Tek-Tips Forums the best source of peer-reviewed technical information on the Internet!

  • Congratulations IamaSherpa on being selected by the Tek-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Rollover on image on image

Status
Not open for further replies.

BPetro

Programmer
Oct 1, 2002
59
US
It appears I can do a rollover (say a glow effect) on text sitting on an image or on an image itself. But if I place an image on top of another image in the png and duplicate its frame and set glow in the second frame - then fireworks appears to set glow on BOTH of the frames. So no rollover occurs.

Is there a way around this?
 
Before I send a sample, after working more with this, I can describe more - perhaps it is based on some lack of experience and not worthy of taking a lot of your time. Here's what I've found... Let's say we want a background of a yard with a frame over it showing a rake laying on the ground and our goal is when it gets mouseover the rake will glow...
1) If I take an image and a frame above it with the rake in non-glow state - and I save that as a gif lets say. Then if I close everything and start working on that new gif (which converts into a png, but does NOT have a frame in it) and I add a new frame with a "glow" version of the second image placed exactly over the first non-glow version. I can now save this as html and the thing will work.
2) But if I try to do this without the extra step of saving the first image and frame (basically force-merging them into one gif) - no matter what sort of group/ungroup behavior I try with frames, if I attach a glow to the rake in one frame, it always carries over and make the other non-glow rake also glow. So any mouseover effect is ruined.

SO - having read all this, is it just a stupid beginner's mistake, you can explain or would you like to see a sample of what I mean. I have found a work-around, but would like to learn what process is the proper process to follow for this.
 
You sound like your using an overly complex method for a very simple task. Your description is quite hard to understand, if you have a link im sure this can be resolved very quickly. Is the rake a seperate image to the yard?
 
Yes indeed it is a separate image at least until, in my workaround, I save it with the background as a gif to then begin adding the glow image. That's the only time we run into this problem. When we have a background image and place on top of it an image of an object wanting it in non-glow and glow versions. I'll get a sample out and respond with a link.
 
Would probably be best to provide a link. Am not sure if you want this as a button that links to something or just purely as an effect. Why not put the picture of 'a rake' on a seperate layer to your background, then make the rake into a button and put a glow effect on the over state?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor

Back
Top