BJCooperIT
Programmer
In the Age Bias thread it has been mentioned that those of us who have a bit of gray should list "extensive experience" rather than "## years experience" on our resumes. I think this is excellent advice.
This, however, leads me to a question. If you have previous employers listed in reverse chronological sequence, should you leave off the starting and ending dates? By looking at the start date of the first job, the total number of years is pretty obvious. If you omit the dates, will a recruiter discard your resume because they cannot determine how long and when you worked for a specific company?
I have a good bit of old mainframe experience. While the technology is mostly outdated, the analysis, design, user training, documentation, team experience, and application exposure are still of value. Any advice on how to effectively consolidate the "early years"?
Any other questions or tips for writing a good resume?
Beware of false knowledge; it is more dangerous than ignorance. ~George Bernard Shaw
Consultant/Custom Forms & PL/SQL - Oracle 8.1.7 - Windows 2000
This, however, leads me to a question. If you have previous employers listed in reverse chronological sequence, should you leave off the starting and ending dates? By looking at the start date of the first job, the total number of years is pretty obvious. If you omit the dates, will a recruiter discard your resume because they cannot determine how long and when you worked for a specific company?
I have a good bit of old mainframe experience. While the technology is mostly outdated, the analysis, design, user training, documentation, team experience, and application exposure are still of value. Any advice on how to effectively consolidate the "early years"?
Any other questions or tips for writing a good resume?
Beware of false knowledge; it is more dangerous than ignorance. ~George Bernard Shaw
Consultant/Custom Forms & PL/SQL - Oracle 8.1.7 - Windows 2000