I am almost positive this cannot be done...but...there is a lot I don't know so it never hurts to ask. I have a customer who receives 150+ calls per day and is out of the office at least 50% of the time. In his old office he had 3-line phones and each person had their own line, so when they left the office they did the *72 call forwarding from Qwest and received the caller ID from the originating caller which enabled him to better manage which calls to answer and which to let go (when he is out of the office he is in court a lot, and has to excuse himself to answer some calls and will let most of them go to voice mail.) Now he has a Magix with inbound DID on a PRI T1, so his forwarded calls show his DID number, not the originating caller...or at least I thought they showed the DID; there is some confusion on that, as well.
He needs the caller ID badly enough to remove the T1 and go back to copper, or add a bunch of copper lines in addition to the T1, which will increase his bill a lot...and there is a real possibility that there aren't enough facilities in the street to add the 10 more he will need (it took 2 months to get pairs for the T1) so finding an alternative answer would be a huge plus.
And...not to offend anyone's sensibilities...would an IP Office be able to handle this issue, or is it still all about the carrier doing the call forwarding versus the switch doing the call forwarding? And would the simultaneous remote call forward feature make any difference? Any help would be appreciated - the guy wants to yank everything out, but that still won't solve his base problem of 10 people in a 25-person office needing this capability. Thanks.
He needs the caller ID badly enough to remove the T1 and go back to copper, or add a bunch of copper lines in addition to the T1, which will increase his bill a lot...and there is a real possibility that there aren't enough facilities in the street to add the 10 more he will need (it took 2 months to get pairs for the T1) so finding an alternative answer would be a huge plus.
And...not to offend anyone's sensibilities...would an IP Office be able to handle this issue, or is it still all about the carrier doing the call forwarding versus the switch doing the call forwarding? And would the simultaneous remote call forward feature make any difference? Any help would be appreciated - the guy wants to yank everything out, but that still won't solve his base problem of 10 people in a 25-person office needing this capability. Thanks.