Usually, for databases you would use RAID-1 (mirroring) rather than RAID-5 (striping+parity). However, space considerations may affect your decision on this.
I agree with Dave. If you have to use RAID5 for space considerations, try to get any logging files on a mirrored LV rather than RAID5. In a real situation, I moved some logging files for an Oracle database from a RAID5 LV to a mirrored LV and noticed definite improvement in performance.
I did some very unscientific tests that consisted of just copying files to various RAID scenarios. The test was copying one large file (more than 1 GB) to RAID5 and RAID1 and copying about 7 GB of thousands of small files to RAID5 and RAID1. For the large file, RAID5 did surprisingly well (within seconds of the RAID1 copy), but I'm not sure if that really equates with what databases do.
Unless I am missing something you only have 1--8gig and 1--9 gig correct? Well your decision has been made for you. With the 2 drives you can only use RAID1. RAID 5, I believe requires 3 hard drives. Raid 1 only needs 2. But it looks like you went with RAID 1. James Collins
Field Service Engineer
A+, MCP
email: butchrecon@skyenet.net
Please let us (Tek-tips members) know if the solutions we provide are helpful to you. Not only do they help you but they may help others.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.