lcolson1959
MIS
We are wanting to increase performance on 1 of our SQL Server's. Right now we have two RAID 5 Arrays. OS and Logs on one and the Data Files; including tempdb on the other. Our other server has RAID 1+0 across 3 separate RAIDS. The only thing that is throwing me is that I thought you needed a minimum of 4 drives for RAID 1+0. Each of the three RAID 1+0 arrays have only 2 drives??
I would not think our protection level is very good with only 2 drives. Granted 1 drive can fail with a catastrophe.
For the server we are wanting to increase performance I am suggesting RAID 1 for the OS & Logs Files that would include 2 drives. RAID 1+0 with 4 drives for the Data files. RAID 1+0 with 2 drives for TempDB. Have I maximized fault tolerance as well as performance with this thought process?
lcolson1959
MCSA, MCDBA, MCTS (SQL 2005), A+, N+, DHTI+
I would not think our protection level is very good with only 2 drives. Granted 1 drive can fail with a catastrophe.
For the server we are wanting to increase performance I am suggesting RAID 1 for the OS & Logs Files that would include 2 drives. RAID 1+0 with 4 drives for the Data files. RAID 1+0 with 2 drives for TempDB. Have I maximized fault tolerance as well as performance with this thought process?
lcolson1959
MCSA, MCDBA, MCTS (SQL 2005), A+, N+, DHTI+