I have a question about my setup and RAID 0 speeds and hard drive speeds in general. I don't seem to be getting what I should out of my setup.
*all hard drives in this post are Western Digital 7200k rpm Special Edition Drives (8mb cache)*
I recently setup a computer with an Adaptec 1200a RAID card and configured a RAID 0 array. Installed Windows XP Pro and benchmarked it with SiSoft.
System Specs:
Intel D865PERL MB
Pentium 4 2.8 800mhz bus 1mb cache
2 x 512mb Crucial PC-3200 Dual Channel
2 x 120GB WD Special Edition HD (8mb cache)
Adaptec 1200a ATA RAID card / RAID0
It averaged 65mbs. Wow, pretty good I thought!
I decided to put a RAID system in my home computer.... I went for an Adaptec 2400a ATA RAID card (has 32mb cache) and setup RAID 0 - two of the same HDs. My System Specs:
Epox 8RDA+ MB
Athlon XP 2800+
2 x 256mb GEIL PC-3200 Dual Channel
2 x 120GB WD Special Edition HS (8mb cache)
Adaptec 2400a ATA RAID Card / RAID0
I ran the same SiSoft benchmark and got a result of 41mbs not too good.
I also have a Western Digital 180GB Special Edition and a Western Digital 200GB Special Edition in my system. Curious, I benchmarked those:
(Both are master drives on their own channels.)
WD 180GB (IDE0): 29mbs
WD 200GB (IDE1): 43mbs
I am totally stumped. I don't know where to go from here. I was expecting at least 60mbs with the RAID and now I'm finding out that my 200GB drive is actually the fastest. I also have NO idea why the difference between the WD180 and the WD200.
Futhermore, i copied the system partition from the RAID to the 180GB drive and ran the benchmarks again thinking maybe the drive that windows was on was doing something to the results. I got the same results booting from a different drive.
The only thing I think of is to try an Adaptec 1200a card. But why would a lesser card give better results? the 2400a is like $250 more!
Any ideas!? THANKS for reading such a long post!
*all hard drives in this post are Western Digital 7200k rpm Special Edition Drives (8mb cache)*
I recently setup a computer with an Adaptec 1200a RAID card and configured a RAID 0 array. Installed Windows XP Pro and benchmarked it with SiSoft.
System Specs:
Intel D865PERL MB
Pentium 4 2.8 800mhz bus 1mb cache
2 x 512mb Crucial PC-3200 Dual Channel
2 x 120GB WD Special Edition HD (8mb cache)
Adaptec 1200a ATA RAID card / RAID0
It averaged 65mbs. Wow, pretty good I thought!
I decided to put a RAID system in my home computer.... I went for an Adaptec 2400a ATA RAID card (has 32mb cache) and setup RAID 0 - two of the same HDs. My System Specs:
Epox 8RDA+ MB
Athlon XP 2800+
2 x 256mb GEIL PC-3200 Dual Channel
2 x 120GB WD Special Edition HS (8mb cache)
Adaptec 2400a ATA RAID Card / RAID0
I ran the same SiSoft benchmark and got a result of 41mbs not too good.
I also have a Western Digital 180GB Special Edition and a Western Digital 200GB Special Edition in my system. Curious, I benchmarked those:
(Both are master drives on their own channels.)
WD 180GB (IDE0): 29mbs
WD 200GB (IDE1): 43mbs
I am totally stumped. I don't know where to go from here. I was expecting at least 60mbs with the RAID and now I'm finding out that my 200GB drive is actually the fastest. I also have NO idea why the difference between the WD180 and the WD200.
Futhermore, i copied the system partition from the RAID to the 180GB drive and ran the benchmarks again thinking maybe the drive that windows was on was doing something to the results. I got the same results booting from a different drive.
The only thing I think of is to try an Adaptec 1200a card. But why would a lesser card give better results? the 2400a is like $250 more!
Any ideas!? THANKS for reading such a long post!