I have a query based on 2 tables. The first table (Profile) has a one-to-many relationship with the second table (Responsibilities) based on the field ID_New. There are UP TO seven "responsibilities" that each record in the Profile table can have. I thought the way I set the tables up was the most efficient in the beginning. Now, I'm wondering if I should've just added seven additional fields to the Profile table.
Here's the problem: I need to query the records in the Profile table to find out which ones have BOTH "Operations" AND "Menu Development" in the Responsibilities table. I only want the query to return the unique records (i.e., no duplicates on ID_New). When I enter Like "Operations" And "Menu Development" it returns no records. When I enter the criteria as an OR statement, I only get the records that match either/or, but not necessarily both. Am I stating this clearly?
Is there something I'm missing in establishing the criteria, or (say it ain't so ) have I set the tables up incorrectly?
Here's the problem: I need to query the records in the Profile table to find out which ones have BOTH "Operations" AND "Menu Development" in the Responsibilities table. I only want the query to return the unique records (i.e., no duplicates on ID_New). When I enter Like "Operations" And "Menu Development" it returns no records. When I enter the criteria as an OR statement, I only get the records that match either/or, but not necessarily both. Am I stating this clearly?
Is there something I'm missing in establishing the criteria, or (say it ain't so ) have I set the tables up incorrectly?