In my experience AMD processors are more stable and give you better "bang for the buck" then Intel processsors. <p> Jeff<br><a href=mailto: masterracker@hotmail.com> masterracker@hotmail.com</a><br><a href= > </a><br>
A friend of mine is going to buy one and I told him I know nothing about them. I always get intels. I didn't want to tell him they were okay and they weren't.
They're cheaper, compatible, and lose nothing when moving to them. There's absolutely nothing to lose, in fact, as these people see, you may gain. <p>REH<br><a href=mailto:hawkdogg@crosswinds.net>hawkdogg@crosswinds.net</a><br><a href=
I have two computers both a AMD K6-2/350<br>
downstairs, and a AMD K6-2/450 overclocked<br>
to 500 upstairs(my baby), and i'm looking<br>
to get an Athlon 650(get this if yer gona<br>
get amd, anythnig after the 650 has a<br>
rediculous price tag, and 650 is easily<br>
overclockable to past 800 with the right<br>
cooling) <p>Karl<br><a href=mailto:kb244@bellsouth.net>kb244@bellsouth.net</a><br><a href=
Also you should wait up for the VIA KX133 chipset, it'll<br>
provide Athlon board makers with AGP 4X and 133Mhtz memory<br>
bus, and some other features i dont remeber <p>Karl<br><a href=mailto:kb244@bellsouth.net>kb244@bellsouth.net</a><br><a href=
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.