nootgevallen
Technical User
Hi ,
Have a problem when routing a ip through symantec 360 vpn
The Symantec has 192.168.1.252
We have a router cisco 192.168.1.1
Routing tabel of the cisco routes every 192.168.4.X to the symantec.
The remote symantec has 192.168.4.1
(optional cisco router 2500)
We have a application that has adres 172.16.X.X
that has to go to 192.168.1.4(a hired line to a company with the adress of the application)
My Vpn tunnel works . I can start almost anything on the other side ping everything on the otherside with subnet 192.168.1.X
But í can't start the application because it can't find the 172.16.x.x adress to go to 192.168.1.4
I also can't ping a remote website ( etc)
I tried disable global tunnel then the remote website works.But it has to get the internet at the other side of the tunnel 192.168.1.254
Still understand it ?
I Used the cisco 2500 to route the ip adress 172.16.x.x through 192.168.1.4 but it reaches the other side but it looks like it doesn't get routed back..
Need help
greetz and thanks for reading my problem
Have a problem when routing a ip through symantec 360 vpn
The Symantec has 192.168.1.252
We have a router cisco 192.168.1.1
Routing tabel of the cisco routes every 192.168.4.X to the symantec.
The remote symantec has 192.168.4.1
(optional cisco router 2500)
We have a application that has adres 172.16.X.X
that has to go to 192.168.1.4(a hired line to a company with the adress of the application)
My Vpn tunnel works . I can start almost anything on the other side ping everything on the otherside with subnet 192.168.1.X
But í can't start the application because it can't find the 172.16.x.x adress to go to 192.168.1.4
I also can't ping a remote website ( etc)
I tried disable global tunnel then the remote website works.But it has to get the internet at the other side of the tunnel 192.168.1.254
Still understand it ?
I Used the cisco 2500 to route the ip adress 172.16.x.x through 192.168.1.4 but it reaches the other side but it looks like it doesn't get routed back..
Need help
greetz and thanks for reading my problem