MartinFrancis
MIS
Is there any way to show some decent quality photos in an Access form without storing the actual images in Access itself?
I have some digital photos stored in one folder and I want to show them in an Access form but without storing them in the database because it would get so large
Some neat code in a previous post showed how this was possible by creating an image control on the form, deleting the image and substituting code which links the image control to the folder the photos are stored in. A text field on the form is used to enter the filename for each photo so by scrolling though the records the form loads and displays the relevant photo in the form each time.
Great, except that the quality of the photos as displayed in the Access form is very poor indeed.
Image quality is not a problem if I store the photo in the underlying table as an ole object but the database gets so large that way. These images are produced by Microsoft Photo Editor. If I link the file the photo comes through in jpeg format which seems to give a poor quality. There must be a way around this, anyone?
I have some digital photos stored in one folder and I want to show them in an Access form but without storing them in the database because it would get so large
Some neat code in a previous post showed how this was possible by creating an image control on the form, deleting the image and substituting code which links the image control to the folder the photos are stored in. A text field on the form is used to enter the filename for each photo so by scrolling though the records the form loads and displays the relevant photo in the form each time.
Great, except that the quality of the photos as displayed in the Access form is very poor indeed.
Image quality is not a problem if I store the photo in the underlying table as an ole object but the database gets so large that way. These images are produced by Microsoft Photo Editor. If I link the file the photo comes through in jpeg format which seems to give a poor quality. There must be a way around this, anyone?