Scenario:
Mirrored volume group with two physical drives and two paging spaces.
Even though the primary copies of each paging space are on separate disk, doesn't this set up still violate the rule of not having two paging spaces share a physical volume?
I think the person who set this up was thinking they would have two spindles for paging, which would improve performance.
In this situation because of the mirroring wouldn't it be better to have one larger space mirrored to the other disk?
Example
lslv -m paging02|pg
paging02:N/A
LP PP1 PV1 PP2 PV2 PP3 PV3
0001 0055 hdisk6 0048 hdisk7
0002 0056 hdisk6 0049 hdisk7
lslv -m paging00|pg
paging00:N/A
LP PP1 PV1 PP2 PV2 PP3 PV3
0001 0080 hdisk7 0023 hdisk6
0002 0081 hdisk7 0024 hdisk6
Mirrored volume group with two physical drives and two paging spaces.
Even though the primary copies of each paging space are on separate disk, doesn't this set up still violate the rule of not having two paging spaces share a physical volume?
I think the person who set this up was thinking they would have two spindles for paging, which would improve performance.
In this situation because of the mirroring wouldn't it be better to have one larger space mirrored to the other disk?
Example
lslv -m paging02|pg
paging02:N/A
LP PP1 PV1 PP2 PV2 PP3 PV3
0001 0055 hdisk6 0048 hdisk7
0002 0056 hdisk6 0049 hdisk7
lslv -m paging00|pg
paging00:N/A
LP PP1 PV1 PP2 PV2 PP3 PV3
0001 0080 hdisk7 0023 hdisk6
0002 0081 hdisk7 0024 hdisk6