Tek-Tips is the largest IT community on the Internet today!

Members share and learn making Tek-Tips Forums the best source of peer-reviewed technical information on the Internet!

  • Congratulations strongm on being selected by the Tek-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

PageFile location? Suggestion?

Status
Not open for further replies.

bran2235

IS-IT--Management
Feb 13, 2002
703
US
Hello Everyone-

Citrix 4.0 / W2k3 SP2 (farm of 26)... Publish the desktop on all servers (mostly Office 2003 Suite, IE, etc.)
M: \System Drive
N: \Data Drive

-Office (used a LOT) on M:
-Misc apps on N: (not used that much)

Building a new box- Anyone have any suggestions on where my pagefile should be created? My old-school thought was wherever there is less I/O... right? ...and 1.5 x physical RAM, right?

Anyone have any suggestions?

Many Thanks!
Brandon
 
bran2235,
I usually just max my server out with 4095 (unless its x64...then you can put it to what ever you want).

My pagefile will usually go on a non-system partition like the D drive but this doesn't matter if you are using a single controller. The only time you can boost your performance on swap files is if you are using a dedicated controller for your OS, dedicated controller for your apps and a dedicated controller for your swap file.

Usually you are running a Citrix server on a single controller with RAID configuration. So there really isn't any performance boost by putting it on your C or any other partition.

Hope that helps.
 
Enigma, YOU ARE THE MAN-

I've never heard that 'argument' before.. but comging from a storage environment, you are exactly right!!
I just discussed this with my boss and we are both in agreement with you...

In all the Citrix training I've been in- this hasnever been mentioned... the only thing abour a swap file / page file that had been discussed if a seperate page file needed to be created (seperate partition, etc.)...

What are your thoughts on that?
 
Aha a favourite of mine. What you have to remember is that we are trying to achieve maximum application performance.

So as enigma99 has stated an endless amount of money means a separate controller for each physical device. Its the spindles that count not the number of partitions on a spindle. If the heads have to start sparking about to find the start of a logical drive then you are affecting performance. I would in that case never partition a physical hard disk. I am not even a great fan of using raid on Citrix servers, (though not averse to using the controllers ;) ).

I would'nt max out the page file, however I will always make it a fixed size. We don't want windows to be using resource to resizing swap files etc.

1.5 x the RAM is good. I can't recall having had to up it at all. But my memory dims with age.

In your case I would make the Page file on your N drive (assuming it is a different physical drive) and would make it 1.5 times the physical RAM.

[blue] A perspective from the other side!![/blue]

Cheers
Scott
 
Thanks, guys!!!

I forgot to mention in my second post that I too am using a RAID 1 set = one logical drive with two partitions (M and N)... One controller for this logical drive.

So, am I correct when I say It doesn't matter which partition my PF is on (in this case)?
 
bran2235,
IMO...it should not matter.
It would only matter if you are trying to capture a full memory dump on your server...then it has to go on the "C" or system drive.

Hope that helps.
 
and set your page file start point (Initial Size) and end point ( Maximum Size) to be the same value. For example....

4095 <Minimum
4095 <Maximum

I've found that this reduces fragmentation of the page file



 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor

Back
Top