At the end of the day, I think it's gotta come down to personal taste. Pretty much every distro uses RPM these days (exceptions I know of being Slackware and Debian), and it appears to getting slightly "My distro has a new kernel than yours" - "Well mine's got more apps with it" at the moment...<br>
<br>
Slackware is normally known as a hackers version of Linux. ie, If you like manually mucking about with your setup, go for this one.<br>
<br>
Caldera is probably the most user friendly at the moment, both installation wise, and usage wise once installed. It does a *MUCH* better job of configuring KDE from install than RedHat does. Retail version also comes with personal use versions of Partition Magic and Boot Manager, which is nice

<br>
<br>
RedHat is getting loads of press because of the recent IPO, as well as various big names aligning themselves with RedHat. Personally, I use RedHat 6.0 cos it was the Linux distro that happened to be nearest to hand last time I felt like scrapping my setup and starting again. (I do this now and again when I get sick of RPMs complaining I don't have the latest version of XYZ, when I downloaded, compiled and installed it only the other week... And using the "ignore" option on 'rpm' then installs miscellaneous files in different locations from where I put them, and, well you get the picture. ;^)<br>
<br>
SuSE - well, it's RedHat, with better on-line documentation, once you've installed it

Also, retail version comes with enough apps to keep anyone busy from now til Y3K and beyond...<br>
<br>
Mandrake, by all accounts, is RedHat with a couple of bells and whistles. Be nice to see where they're going with it, though.<br>
<br>
But at the end of the day, they're all running the same kernel (or will be, once you download and compile the latest

, running the same apps, with minor version differences, so it starts to come down to a matter of taste. Do you prefer KDE to be installed as default? (Caldera) Or Gnome/Enlightenment? (RedHat) (Just to throw in my 2 cents again, if you're machines a little resource deficient - ie, not PII 233 or above - I'd go for KDE. Or, even better, WindowMaker, cos it's small, neat, and it rocks. Oh, and it's a lot more resource friendly than either KDE or Gnome, according to my dusty old P166

<br>
<br>
Then again, run FreeBSD as your main OS, and go through each of the Linux distros. Use each of them for a while and decide which you prefer

<br>
<br>
One tip, you might want to think about creating more than two partitions. I'd add a /home partition that can be shared between FreeBSD and Linux distro X, and maybe throw in a common data partition as well, for sticking things like RPM packages you've tried on one distro, and want to install on the next in line.<br>
<br>
Anyway, sounds like you're gonna have some fun. Enjoy!