As I see it, it is most likely because of[ul][li]the differences between how and what "old" and "new" virii infect[/li][li]what we most commonly store on those backups[/li][li]who is doing the restore[/li][/ul]
Most modern virii make use of scripting languages and are transported along with data. The old virii often were assembly-language code that wedged itself into executable files.
Most backups, to my experience, are of data, not executables. The "old" virii get left behind, wedged into non-backed-up executables on old systems.
Those who restore data from old backup systems are likely corporate entities, who are likely to have antivirus in place.
I think the comparison of computer virii to biological virii is a good one. The virus authors are the mutation engines that retrovirii have built into their replication mechanisms. The antivirus vendors are the immune system, trying to keep the virii from infecting.
There is in epidemiology the concept of a natural reservoir for diseases. Rubella, for example, has no
reservoir in nature but mankind. Other diseases, such as influenza, have as reservoirs
other animals.
It may be that with changes in operating systems and productivity software, the natural reservoir for an old virus is evaporating.
Want the best answers?
Ask the best questions!
TANSTAAFL!!