Why "not dissimilar"? Why bother with the negative "not" if you are gonna use a negatively suffixed word? Doesn't that just play with your readers' heads?
Although technically "not dissimilar" means the same as "similar", the common use of "not dissimilar" is to imply a state of "not exactly similar either". Confused?
Me too.
Tracy Dryden
Meddle not in the affairs of dragons,
For you are crunchy, and good with mustard.
Skip, [red]Be advised:[/red]When Viscounts were guillotined just as they were disclosing where their jewels were hidden, it shows to go that you should... Never hatchet your Counts before they chicken!
Not at all. The use of negating of a negative term is called a litotes. It is generally used to understate the affirmative position.
To say they are 'not dissimilar' means to me that they have a lot in common, but aren't quite close enough to considered similar. Close, but not quite there. Another commonly used litotes is 'not uncommon'. It's not uncommon for people to use the phrase 'not uncommon'.
Good Luck
--------------
To get the most from your Tek-Tips experience, please read FAQ181-2886 As a circle of light increases so does the circumference of darkness around it. - Albert Einstein
Sorry, MakeItSo, while you are 10 minutes away from your end of day, my day is just beginning. My reference to "artificial insetimation" was a lame attempt at a little humour, creating a Spoonerism on "artifician insemination". It is a "stretch" at humour even for native English speakers, not to mention those for which English is a second language. My apologies.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.