I'm planning on implementing NLB with two servers which are connected (no teaming) to two different 5500-stacks which on their turn are connected to two 8800's. One of the 8800's is the VRRP active router for the VLAN the servers are connected to. It also has the active connections from the 5500's as the 5500's block the interface to the other 8800 by MSTP.
In other threads I've read that I should use NLB with multicast, no unicast. But I still have some questions.
- The 8800's are the routers (VRRP) for the VLAN so I should add static ARP for the virtual mac-address of NLB only on the two 8800's right?
- On both 8800's I should add a static multi-port mac-address for the virtual mac-address of NLB. I assume I should on the 'passive' 8800 add the static multi-port mac-address pointing to the interfaces which would be unblocked in case the 'active' 8800 should fail and STP en VRRP failover. Is this true?
- Now, also considering the default differences in 5500's and 8800's, which settings should be true? Is usage of IGMP preferable or just plain multicast? Multi-cast routing should only be enabled on the VLAN-interfaces (on the 8800's)?
In other threads I've read that I should use NLB with multicast, no unicast. But I still have some questions.
- The 8800's are the routers (VRRP) for the VLAN so I should add static ARP for the virtual mac-address of NLB only on the two 8800's right?
- On both 8800's I should add a static multi-port mac-address for the virtual mac-address of NLB. I assume I should on the 'passive' 8800 add the static multi-port mac-address pointing to the interfaces which would be unblocked in case the 'active' 8800 should fail and STP en VRRP failover. Is this true?
- Now, also considering the default differences in 5500's and 8800's, which settings should be true? Is usage of IGMP preferable or just plain multicast? Multi-cast routing should only be enabled on the VLAN-interfaces (on the 8800's)?