I will get a Dell 2650 with max procesors, 6GB ram, 3 18 GB drives (raid-1 plus spare) and 2 FC HBA.
Operation system will be WIN2K Advance server and running IIS5 and SPS
Will this be a fast server or should I have stayed on a 6450
You don't mention the most important things, like how many concurrent users, what types of pages, how fast of a network link, and that good stuff. Any server will be fast if not doing anything!
And what is SPS?
Things that would have made it faster are:
-having another hdd, then you could have two mirrors (on separate controllers), one for OS, one for Apps
-Hopefully you're using HW raid, not sw
-For the $$ you saved on the 2650 v the 6450, you probably could have bought two 2650's one for IIS, and one for SPS
Server will be on 1Gbit/s ethernet.
Number of concurrent users I don't know, but there could be as many as 700-900 users.
SPS is Microsoft Sharepoint Portal Server
HDD will be 2 x 18 GB 10.000 RPM + one spare active disks on there own channel to the raid cntl. (This is only for the C: drive data will not be on the server)
2 Qlogic 2200F HBA's. Data will be on a StorageTek SVA9500
I have some "spare" 6450 that I could have used but I will get 4 2650 monday. One is the one I ask about here.
SPS req. IIS så I will put that on the same server.
My biggest "but" is that I don't know if SPS will use more then 2GB ram.
Since we don't have any data on the local HDD I just went for the 10.000 RPM drives. The we can still try to keep the same type of HDD in most of our servers.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.