Tek-Tips is the largest IT community on the Internet today!

Members share and learn making Tek-Tips Forums the best source of peer-reviewed technical information on the Internet!

  • Congratulations biv343 on being selected by the Tek-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

New VPN Installation - MS or Sonicwall?

Status
Not open for further replies.

dball63

MIS
Jan 31, 2001
308
US
I need to install a new VPN solution for a very small business. They only have one remote user that needs connectivity. I have some experience setting up VPN using sonicwall tz170 and I'm not sure if I want to go that route again or try something different. I have heard good things about MS server solution?

Business consists of; 1 MS 2003 server w/ 1 internal nic, 1 Netgear rt324 gateway router doing NAT, Already have routable public adresses available to use.

What do you think is good solution for this? I need something cost effective and with little required maintentance if possible.

David
Sacramento, CA
 
I very much prefer keeping VPN traffic away from the server, and out of the PC if at all possible.
I firmly believe in stopping everything at the firewall and using ipSEC.
If you don't want to spend the money for a sonicwall (good firewall), you can pick up a ZyWALL 10W on eBay for around $100. For the other end, a ZyWALL 2 should do.

I have seven clients (plus myself) using ZyWALL hardware with multiple tunnels, and I have no regrets.
 
I have a similar scenario I am going the sonicwall route. I am sure a VPN headend needs a dedicated device, I certainly would not use a w2k3 server as it may compromise the efficiency of the box as a hardware server. I looked at various other options but came back to the same solution.

Maintenance is an issue, but I suggest if your client has a good enough business case to justify the expense of a VPN solution then they can probably justify your services on a regular basis to maintain and troubleshoot the solution. My client is expecting the solution to bring in £60k per annum so is happy to spend money on a hardware VPN solution and pay me for regular support.
 
For a small number of users (15) I would use a hardware device as the sonicwall. If you have many users, a dedicated fast server would be the way to go. I would keep the VPN setup off a server which is used for other services.
You need to figure in the cost of electric for a server about $500 per year, OS maintenance, hardware failure, virus protection, disaster recovery,tape backup.

Are you going to use Terminal services?
 
Are you going to use Terminal services?

No, No plans to use TS at this time.

I agree with others have said and confirmed my thoughts about keeping these services off of the server if possible.

I think I may go the TZ 170 route again. I can't recall if the TZ170 includes one VPN license or not. Can anyone confirm?

David
Sacramento, CA
 
David...

You really must try Terminal services, admin mode which is a freebie for two connections, easy to setup. You can remotely manage or run programs as an administrator. Once you get the VPN up, you can run it through a secure VPN tunnel, very transparent, fantastic tool.

Don't remember about the VPN license, but there is no mention of a freebie, knowing Sonic, they charge for everything. Just searched, the literature is confusing as ever, best to call them directly.

 
I use a PIX firewall for our VPN headend device. Worked wonderfully.

Computer/Network Technician
CCNA
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor

Back
Top