Tek-Tips is the largest IT community on the Internet today!

Members share and learn making Tek-Tips Forums the best source of peer-reviewed technical information on the Internet!

  • Congratulations Mike Lewis on being selected by the Tek-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Neither ... nor

Status
Not open for further replies.

rexxhead

Programmer
Jul 31, 2002
611
US
When excluding a list of things, I always "neither A nor B nor C nor D". Recently, I had a set-to with a colleague who changed that to "neither A nor B or C or D".

I can see that she was thinking "neither A nor (B or C or D)", but I feel that this construction allows for some ambiguity, and I HATE ambiguity.

What do you think?

Frank Clarke
--America's source for adverse opinions since 1943.
 
Strictly SQL: [TT]NOT IN('A', 'B', 'C', 'D')[/TT] [upsidedown]
As an English language, you can probably argue either way (or is it 'both ways'...?)

---- Andy

"Hmm...they have the internet on computers now"--Homer Simpson
 
From the pedant's point of view, neither should be restricted to two negated choices. However there are sources that tolerate, or outright accept more than two.

What you really want is either:

"Not any of A or B or C or D."

or

"None of A or B or C or D.
 
Merge mansion


Skip,
[sub]
[glasses]Just traded in my OLD subtlety...
for a NUance![tongue][/sub]
"The most incomprehensible thing about the universe is that it is comprehensible" A. Einstein

You Matter...
unless you multiply yourself by the speed of light squared, then...
You Energy!
 
This is surely one of those cases where the correct choice is what sounds right - regardless of the strict rules of grammar. In this case, I'm with you, Frank. Your choice is the one that sounds right to me, and therefore the one that I would choose.

Mike

__________________________________
Mike Lewis (Edinburgh, Scotland)

Visual FoxPro articles, tips and downloads
 
I've just checked my two favourite reference books, but neither Bryson[sup]1[/sup] nor Fowler[sup]2[/sup] has anything to say that throws any light on this.

But there is a related question on which they both agree: on the number (singular or plural) of the verb following an neither/nor construct. In most cases, the verb should be singular: Neither Bill Gates nor Jeff Bezos is infallible. That sounds right to me.

But consider the case where the nouns are both plural: Neither the men nor the women has anything. That sounds wrong. And what about where there is a mixture: Niether Bill Gates nor his fellow philanthropists [has? have?] considered the problem.

In cases like these, Bryson says that the verb should agree in number with the noun that is closest to it. So in that last example, the verb should be have because philanthropists are plural.

Fowler cites several more complications, including: Neither you nor I [is? am? are?] the right person for the job and Neither employer nor employees will say what [he wants? they want?]. Fowler says that, rather than face these uncertainties, the "wise man" will rephrase the entire sentence. (He doesn't say what the wise woman would do.)

1. Bryson, Bill. Troublesome Words, Penguin 1997.
2. Fowler, H.W. Modern English Usage, Oxford 1968.

Mike

__________________________________
Mike Lewis (Edinburgh, Scotland)

Visual FoxPro articles, tips and downloads
 
I think "neither" implies only two choices.
Less ambiguous would be "not a or b or c or d".
 
The usage is in a legal document. Legal eagles don't speak programish as a general rule, therefore the wording as if it were an essay (rather than a program).

Frank Clarke
--America's source for adverse opinions since 1943.
 
Since were talkin' about English conversation and writing and not the rigor of math or coding, I'd be apt to use normal conjunctive rules like...

"I would choose a, b and c," meaning all three. One might also say, "I would choose a and b and c," meaning all three.
"I would choose a, b or c," meaning any one of the three. One might also say, "I would choose a or b or c," meaning any one of the three.
"I would choose neither a, b nor c," meaning none of the three. One might also say, "I would choose neither a nor b nor c," meaning none of the three.

Skip,
[sub]
[glasses]Just traded in my OLD subtlety...
for a NUance![tongue][/sub]
"The most incomprehensible thing about the universe is that it is comprehensible" A. Einstein

You Matter...
unless you multiply yourself by the speed of light squared, then...
You Energy!
 
On further review, I find that "neither" can apply to more than two alternatives. According to Oxford Languages, the correct conjunction is "nor".
 
rexxhead said:
The usage is in a legal document
in this case I think it is essential to remove any possibell ambiguity & rephrasing is in order

Do things on the cheap & it will cost you dear

Avaya Remote Support Engineer (A.R.S.E)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor

Back
Top