Background:
I have a cisco 2600 with version 12.3(11) which is connected to a trunking port on a 2950. Basically I setup router on a stick. The internal networks are 192.168.7, 192.168.49, 192.168.99. I have this part working as well as nat overload.
So I have accomplished the many to one.
So my fa0/0 is my internal and fa0/1 is my external to the outside world
Problem:
I want to be able to ssh to an internal machine by doing portforwarding so if someone comes from the given external ip on a particular 4505 they should then be forwarded to 4505 on the internal machine.
Now i was able to achieve this without encapsulation on the fa0/0 port but I need encapsulation on that interface so that I can do vlans and trunking.
Am I missing something?
So the overall goal is to have .99,.7.49 communicate to each other and being able to ssh to an internal machine on a particular port. Is this possible
I have a cisco 2600 with version 12.3(11) which is connected to a trunking port on a 2950. Basically I setup router on a stick. The internal networks are 192.168.7, 192.168.49, 192.168.99. I have this part working as well as nat overload.
So I have accomplished the many to one.
So my fa0/0 is my internal and fa0/1 is my external to the outside world
Problem:
I want to be able to ssh to an internal machine by doing portforwarding so if someone comes from the given external ip on a particular 4505 they should then be forwarded to 4505 on the internal machine.
Now i was able to achieve this without encapsulation on the fa0/0 port but I need encapsulation on that interface so that I can do vlans and trunking.
Am I missing something?
So the overall goal is to have .99,.7.49 communicate to each other and being able to ssh to an internal machine on a particular port. Is this possible