NAT and Port Ranges

[pc2mike]

Has CISCO figured out that there is a need for nat port ranges yet, or are they still in the dark? I've dinked with trying to setup a route-map pointing to an acl with port ranges, but can't get it to work. I've settled with putting in 200 static maps in the config

ie.
ip nat inside source static tcp 192.168.100.10 3389 208.XXX.XXX.XXX 3389

Anyone else have any suggestings?
Tks,
Mike

 

[lambent]

try to use Excel...until Cisco provides such feature