Tek-Tips is the largest IT community on the Internet today!

Members share and learn making Tek-Tips Forums the best source of peer-reviewed technical information on the Internet!

  • Congratulations IamaSherpa on being selected by the Tek-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Name Resolution oddity

Status
Not open for further replies.

polymath5

MIS
Dec 23, 2000
512
US
OK, here's a weird one.

Our T1 went down and local machine name resolution went way slow.

I could ping by IP and get instant response, pinging by machine name took a long time to resolve. It would resolve and the ping had no failures. It just took a long time to resolve the name.

When the T would came back up, name resolution was its old speedy self.

This occured from either NT4sp6a workstations or W2K pro.

I'm running WINS, (no local DNS servers), Not running LMHOSTS on local machines.
Gateway settings point to our Firewall.
The WINS db looks OK on both WINS servers. Replication between them looks good. No errors in Event Logs.

I just can't seem to figure why not having interenet/DNS server access would slow it down as DNS is the last thing hit when resolving NetBIOS (machine) names.

NetBIOS name resolution order
NetBIOS Name Cache
WINS Server
B-node broadcast
LMHOSTS file
HOSTS file
DNS Server

Any ideas?
Thanks! :)
 
When you ping the name you use actually the IP name resolution (not NetBIOS).
And in that case the order is:
1. HOSTS
2. DNS queries!!!!
3. NetBIOS cache
5. WINS
6.b-node
7. LMHOSTS
Gia Betiu
m.betiu@chello.nl
Computer Eng. CNE 4, CNE 5
 
Thanks Gia. You're absolutly right.

What gets me is that I remembered hours after I posted that pinging is a WinSock resolution request. Duh! X-) So of course it's Hosts/DNS.

Talk about needing a vacation/mental reboot.

Thanks very much again for taking the time to give me a hand. :)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor

Back
Top