Pix cannot be the midpoint of a hub-spoke arrangement vpn (in other words, if you have this sort of arrangement;
Pix A --(vpn)-- Pix B --(vpn)-- Pix C
Then Pix A can communicate with Pix B, and Pix B can communicate with Pix C, but Pix A *cannot* communicate with Pix C. You would need to create a seperate vpn between Pix A and C, you can't "pass through" Pix B (you could do if you replaced Pix B with a concentrator for example)
So you'll have to set the pix up so each has a seperate vpn to each other, ie, a fully meshed vpn topology.
Why do the sites all have to be on the same subnet? If that's the case, then that's going to be a problem, as the Pix cannot properly NAT traffic and then pass it through a vpn, not without causing you problems with your internet access (I have an open issue with TAC at the moment about this very issue, if I get a resolution I'll post more details, but it seems that it cannot be done without a seperate NAT device)
Chico
CCNA, MCSE, Cisco Firewall specialist, VPN specialist, wannabe CCSP
