Now, kudzu detects the two raid devices installed a sda and sdb. Dmesg reposts
Vendor: RaidWeb. Model: Com Rev: 0001
Type: Direct-Access ANSI SCSI revision: 03
Vendor: RaidWeb. Model: Com Rev: 0001
Type: Direct-Access ANSI SCSI revision: 03
Attached scsi disk sda at scsi1, channel 0, id 1, lun 0
Attached scsi disk sdb at scsi1, channel 0, id 2, lun 0
(scsi1:0:1:0) Synchronous at 160.0 Mbyte/sec, offset 31.
SCSI device sda: 1050918912 512-byte hdwr sectors (538070 MB)
sda: unknown partition table
(scsi1:0:2:0) Synchronous at 160.0 Mbyte/sec, offset 31.
SCSI device sdb: 1050918912 512-byte hdwr sectors (538070 MB)
sdb: unknown partition table
I just want to draw your attention to the "unknown partition table" clause. I guess it says so as I have not given ita filesystem yet. Here I guess I go,
'mkfs -t ext2' or just 'mkfs -t'
Now am I correct in assuming that if I reinstall the OS on the server now, when it brings up the format partition section, it would also list sda and sdb and here I can specify a mount point and a file system ext2 for it.
Now my question is, are these two options equivalent. I could go with either.
Please correct me if I am wrong and also which do you think would be faster.
Thanks a bunch.
Vendor: RaidWeb. Model: Com Rev: 0001
Type: Direct-Access ANSI SCSI revision: 03
Vendor: RaidWeb. Model: Com Rev: 0001
Type: Direct-Access ANSI SCSI revision: 03
Attached scsi disk sda at scsi1, channel 0, id 1, lun 0
Attached scsi disk sdb at scsi1, channel 0, id 2, lun 0
(scsi1:0:1:0) Synchronous at 160.0 Mbyte/sec, offset 31.
SCSI device sda: 1050918912 512-byte hdwr sectors (538070 MB)
sda: unknown partition table
(scsi1:0:2:0) Synchronous at 160.0 Mbyte/sec, offset 31.
SCSI device sdb: 1050918912 512-byte hdwr sectors (538070 MB)
sdb: unknown partition table
I just want to draw your attention to the "unknown partition table" clause. I guess it says so as I have not given ita filesystem yet. Here I guess I go,
'mkfs -t ext2' or just 'mkfs -t'
Now am I correct in assuming that if I reinstall the OS on the server now, when it brings up the format partition section, it would also list sda and sdb and here I can specify a mount point and a file system ext2 for it.
Now my question is, are these two options equivalent. I could go with either.
Please correct me if I am wrong and also which do you think would be faster.
Thanks a bunch.