Am I correct that Mas90 and Mas 200 and Mas 200 SQL have identical table names and structures? Or at least for the most part?
So if I wrote a bunch or crystal reports for Mas90 they would easily convert to Mas 200? Am I correct in this regard?
Software Sales, Training, Implementation and Support for Macola, eSynergy, and Crystal Reports
"A fine is a tax for doing wrong. A tax is a fine for doing well.
" - unknown
So if I wrote a bunch or crystal reports for Mas90 they would easily convert to Mas 200? Am I correct in this regard?
Software Sales, Training, Implementation and Support for Macola, eSynergy, and Crystal Reports
"A fine is a tax for doing wrong. A tax is a fine for doing well.
" - unknown