All,
At the site where I am working they have a Cobol program that is written in Cobol and runs under CICS. This program issues a CICS START command to run another Cobol program. Th 2nd program reads a large TSQ and processes until the end of the Q.
As this is effectively the same as running a batch TSO program being driven by files, I asked why the CICS approach was taken, rather than the more usual TSO, to be told that as the CICS region had a higher priority than TSO, it was faster.
Has anybody any experience of the performance differences between TSO and CICS, or any idea where I can obtain such information. I'm not disputing what I've been told, it just that I've never come across it being done like this before.
Thanks in advance for any info.
Marc
At the site where I am working they have a Cobol program that is written in Cobol and runs under CICS. This program issues a CICS START command to run another Cobol program. Th 2nd program reads a large TSQ and processes until the end of the Q.
As this is effectively the same as running a batch TSO program being driven by files, I asked why the CICS approach was taken, rather than the more usual TSO, to be told that as the CICS region had a higher priority than TSO, it was faster.
Has anybody any experience of the performance differences between TSO and CICS, or any idea where I can obtain such information. I'm not disputing what I've been told, it just that I've never come across it being done like this before.
Thanks in advance for any info.
Marc