Tek-Tips is the largest IT community on the Internet today!

Members share and learn making Tek-Tips Forums the best source of peer-reviewed technical information on the Internet!

  • Congratulations strongm on being selected by the Tek-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Loopback NAT Ignored

Status
Not open for further replies.

Dinkytoy

IS-IT--Management
Jun 14, 2007
147
GB
This is a bit of a long shot but you never know what others have seen.

I have a situation where it seems the Loopback NAT rule for a public IP address is simply being ignored.

I have a rule as follows, created by the wizard:

Firewalled Subnets xxx Public xxx Public xxx Private xxx Services Original Any Any 59

Now 'Firewalled Subnets' contains about 8 different subnets, but the NAT rule only seems to work for the Primary LAN subnet rather than all of them.

If I create a dedicated NAT rule for one of the subnets, it also ignores it. If I delete and recreate it, it makes no difference. I'm at a loss to work it out.

I've raised it with Sonicwall but I can't implement their suggested 'firmware change' for another week so just putting it out there. Anyone seen anything like it before?
 
There could be another policy that has a higher priority. That's the only thing I can think of off the top of my head.

 
Nah, you can't manually control the NAT priorities they are auto-assigned. The only way is making one more specific, but even when I do that it's ignored.
 
Rolled back the firmware, made no difference. However, I did find the problem which was a mistake in an ACL allowing access to the local DMZ ip range rather than the External range.

I had forgotten that the NAT is applied after the ACL.

Interestingly, though, Sonicwall checked my prior config and proclaimed it correct. Quality support.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor

Back
Top