I am helping out at a church/school on a network that is pretty dated. They have a server with Active Directory. A few months ago their DSL went down. The company installed a new router and that router is now doing the DSL role. Prior to that we had static addresses. When they did that, the domain took on a .local at the end of the name. So MyChurch became MyChurch.local. I just tried to join a PC to the domain, but I could not. The error said the domain could not be found. The existing PCs do (slowly) log into the domain.
The PC in question is a Win 7 Pro. I can ping the server that has AD installed. I can browse to and log into a network folder using AD credentials.
I know enough about servers and AD to be considered the "expert" at the church. I also know that I don't know much at all.
Any ideas on the .local?
We'd like the staff, students and faculty to log on to the network for the security and the advantages of network storage. We like the setup of having network home and shared folders and network printers. We like the option of using internal email. We have the exchange licenses--but we havn't done this for years so I could drop the exchange part. We have one server that is backed up and about 25 PCs. We have no current plans to expand this. Do I need AD?
The PC in question is a Win 7 Pro. I can ping the server that has AD installed. I can browse to and log into a network folder using AD credentials.
I know enough about servers and AD to be considered the "expert" at the church. I also know that I don't know much at all.
Any ideas on the .local?
We'd like the staff, students and faculty to log on to the network for the security and the advantages of network storage. We like the setup of having network home and shared folders and network printers. We like the option of using internal email. We have the exchange licenses--but we havn't done this for years so I could drop the exchange part. We have one server that is backed up and about 25 PCs. We have no current plans to expand this. Do I need AD?