Dear All,
I would be very thankful for any useful insights anybody can provide on the following problem:
My network is setup as follows:
Internet
| s0/0 (2 Mbit l.line)
Cisco 3640---------------Cisco 2621
|s1/3 | (128K l.line)
|(128K l.line) |
| |
|s0 |
Cisco2501------------------|
s1
EIGRP is the routing protocol. My router is Cisco 2501 which is connected by 2 128Kbit/s leased lines to the 2 backbone routers. The goal is to achieve load sharing for incoming packets so that inbound traffic traverses both lines effectively giving approx. 256Kbit/s bandwidth.
To make the two routes have the same metric I have increased the delay for s0/0 on Cisco 3640 to 40000 usec.
Here is the resulting routing table entry:
---------------
Routing entry for 212.38.116.32/27
Known via "eigrp 1", distance 90, metric 21049600, type internal
Redistributing via eigrp 1
Last update from 212.38.118.1 on Serial0/0, 00:13:07 ago
Routing Descriptor Blocks:
* 212.38.116.3, from 212.38.116.3, 00:13:07 ago, via Serial1/3
Route metric is 21049600, traffic share count is 1
Total delay is 41000 microseconds, minimum bandwidth is 128 Kbit
Reliability 255/255, minimum MTU 1500 bytes
Loading 1/255, Hops 1
212.38.118.1, from 212.38.118.1, 00:13:07 ago, via Serial0/0
Route metric is 21049600, traffic share count is 1
Total delay is 41000 microseconds, minimum bandwidth is 128 Kbit
Reliability 252/255, minimum MTU 1500 bytes
Loading 33/255, Hops 2
----------------------------
As you can see two routes appear to have equal cost and theoretically traffic should be equally split. Now in reality traffic only flows over the longer branch ??!!
Any ideas ?
Thanks in Advance
I would be very thankful for any useful insights anybody can provide on the following problem:
My network is setup as follows:
Internet
| s0/0 (2 Mbit l.line)
Cisco 3640---------------Cisco 2621
|s1/3 | (128K l.line)
|(128K l.line) |
| |
|s0 |
Cisco2501------------------|
s1
EIGRP is the routing protocol. My router is Cisco 2501 which is connected by 2 128Kbit/s leased lines to the 2 backbone routers. The goal is to achieve load sharing for incoming packets so that inbound traffic traverses both lines effectively giving approx. 256Kbit/s bandwidth.
To make the two routes have the same metric I have increased the delay for s0/0 on Cisco 3640 to 40000 usec.
Here is the resulting routing table entry:
---------------
Routing entry for 212.38.116.32/27
Known via "eigrp 1", distance 90, metric 21049600, type internal
Redistributing via eigrp 1
Last update from 212.38.118.1 on Serial0/0, 00:13:07 ago
Routing Descriptor Blocks:
* 212.38.116.3, from 212.38.116.3, 00:13:07 ago, via Serial1/3
Route metric is 21049600, traffic share count is 1
Total delay is 41000 microseconds, minimum bandwidth is 128 Kbit
Reliability 255/255, minimum MTU 1500 bytes
Loading 1/255, Hops 1
212.38.118.1, from 212.38.118.1, 00:13:07 ago, via Serial0/0
Route metric is 21049600, traffic share count is 1
Total delay is 41000 microseconds, minimum bandwidth is 128 Kbit
Reliability 252/255, minimum MTU 1500 bytes
Loading 33/255, Hops 2
----------------------------
As you can see two routes appear to have equal cost and theoretically traffic should be equally split. Now in reality traffic only flows over the longer branch ??!!
Any ideas ?
Thanks in Advance