Tek-Tips is the largest IT community on the Internet today!

Members share and learn making Tek-Tips Forums the best source of peer-reviewed technical information on the Internet!

  • Congratulations Chriss Miller on being selected by the Tek-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Load Balancing Terminal Server

Status
Not open for further replies.

sifiguy

IS-IT--Management
Mar 5, 2002
22
NZ
Hi

Just wondering what the options for load blancing Terminal Server are? I'm considering NLB (with or without session dir) but was wondering if I can do something more elegant using clustering?

NLB balances only on network load. Can I build a 2003 cluster and use it to balance load across a few terminal servers, based on CPU, memory, number of sessions, etc?

Can anyone recommend a hardware load balancer?

Regards
Simon
 
Cisco and foundry both have load ballancers built into there switches and routers. BigIP also makes a good load ballancer. These all use number of sessions however.

NLB will work just as well as a hardware solution for TS.

I'd recommend staying away from clustering. Clustering isn't designed to spread the load. It's designed to make a server redundant. NLB is the way to go here.

Denny

--Anything is possible. All it takes is a little research. (Me)

[noevil]
(My very old site)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor

Back
Top