Actually CompanionLink doesn't do the same thing. CompanionLinks is very basic - some of the differences include:
1) Handheld Contact is wireless, CompanionLink requires you to cradle sync - so you can get updates while you're on the road.
2) Activities scheduled on the device do not attach to contacts in CL
3) HHC can send 76 fields, CL has 4 custom fields
4) HHC will also record emails, phone calls and SMS sent from the device and sync them to ACT! history
5) HHC allows you to see other ACT! users' activities AND to schedule for them
6) HHC is centrally administered and supports OTA installs, CL requires it to be set up on each users' PC
7) HHC can support custom activities and histories in ACT!
There are other differences, but these are the main ones.
Regards,
Mike Lazarus
ACT! Evangelist
GL Computing, Aust
For contact's standard fields, it's ok... the biggest problem I have with it is in creating activities on the BB that don't attach to the contact and creating histories of calls/emails.... and also the lack of wireless sync.
But if those aren't important to you, it's a fair product for a cheaper alternative.
The extra fields and custom activities/histories in HHC are nice, and the central admin and scheduling for other users are probably only useful for larger sites
One of the things I like about ACT! is the range of third-party tools that provide different ways for different users and budgets to get what they need from the product.
Regards,
Mike Lazarus
ACT! Evangelist
GL Computing, Aust
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.